An Overview on the Speech of Her Excellency Cory Aquino

   The speech of the former President Corazon C. Aquino highlighted that the freedom of the Philippines has come through the sacrifice of her husband, Ninoy, and all the Filipinos who gave their lives.

In the first part of the speech, Pres. Corazon Aquino commemorates the death of his husband Ninoy Aquino. She said that this death of Ninoy is the new birth of freedom. She felt painful when she remembered what the dictatorship had done to Ninoy. Three years ago, Corazon and her children left America and went back to the Philippines because of the burial of her husband. Cory also said that they have lost Ninoy Three times. The first time is the imprisonment of Ninoy. Second is the 43 days of secret investigation of him. And lastly, the day he died. So in the spirit of his husband, Pres. Corazon continues what her husband started, the fight for democracy.

In the 1984 elections, Cory participated. Even she was warned by the lawyers that she will not won, Cory didn’t stop because as she said,” I am not fighting for the lawyers, but for the people in whose intelligence whose implicit faith.” But the election was doomed. All votes for her was ignored by the Commission on Elections. Even though Cory was fooled, she knew that this election measures the difference between the power of her and the dictator.

In 1985, the dictatorship called for the snap elections to prove who is more powerful. All the people were scared to risk their lives. But in the end, Cory still won, through the support of the people.

In the second part, shows her gratitude to America and to those people who chose her as president. Cory states that she will restore a full constitutional government, a democracy that people wanted. And also, there will be congressional elections for more peaceful administration.

By: Ken Benitez

The third part, Cory stated the issue about the economic state of the country. She said that because of the dictatorship, the Philippines’ foreign debt had grown to $26 billion. “But this debt” she said “we shall honor it”. When she met Pres. Reagan, they talked about the union between their countries. This meeting, she said, is a new beginning and should lead to positive results in all areas of common concern.

Cory will face the poverty and massive unemployment of her country for the past 14 years because of the fight for democracy. Cory told that whenever she went to her campaign areas, in the slum and impoverished villages, the people there do not want food, money, or work – even that they needed it, but rather they want democracy. So at this moment, Cory felt the pressing obligation to respond quickly as a leader of a people who deserves of all these things.

Cory also admitted that in paying large foreign debts, it would be difficult. The Philippines could only pay the debt’s interest.

In the end of the speech, she thanked America for giving her family the haven from oppression for three years of their living there. And she also encouraged America to join the union, to build new homes of democracy, another haven for the oppressed, and may stand as a shining testament of the two nation’s commitment to freedom.

Aquino emphasized the following as her claim:

1.     The sense of Nationalism of Ninoy Aquino;

2.     The democracy which Juan dela Cruz desires;

3.     The poverty which most of her countrymen experiencing during the regime of Marcos;

4.     Economic issues which she tried to resolve;

. .   The death of democracy, the reign of dictatorship and the regaining of what was lost;

5.     and, Peace and Integrity she wanted to establish again.

She aslo asserted the following as to make her claims clear:

1.     The death of Ninoy as a new birth of freedom;

2.     The restoration of a full constitutional government

3.     Addressing the problem about the poverty and unemployment in the country cause by the 14 years of fighting for democracy.

4.     Paying the foreign debts.

5.     The should be democratic government for a integrated and peaceful country.

6.     The union between the Philippines and the other country that was destroyed by the dictatorship of Marcos.          

President Cory Aquino's historic speech before the U.S. Congress

       On September 18, 1986, just 7 months after she was swept to power by a popular revolt against dictator Ferdinand Marcos, president Corazon C. Aquino addressed the joint session of the United States Congress during her first visit to the country as the new president of the Republic of the Philippines and since she came home to bury slain opposition leader and husband Sen. Benigno "Ninoy" S. Aquino, Jr. in August 1983.

          The former president encouraged and offered the people in her speech during the joint session of the U.S. Congress to form an integrated nation and a peaceful country. She also embolden the minds of the Filipinos to stand from the quicksand with which the communist administration of Marcos snared the Filipino people within almost two decades.  

           As it was being declared as well that the revolution that brought Aquino to power was "the cheapest revolution ever," she also told cheering lawmakers that her nation deserves to be freed from the "slavery" of its ravaged economy. She appealed for both the U.S. government and private investors to "build a new home for democracy" in the Philippines, now staggering under a $26-billion foreign debt.

            It is also observable that amid sorrows and problems she faced before the said session she still looks strong since she helped as well her countrymen to overthrow Marcos from its position last People Power Revolution.

           Aside from her expressions it is also remarkable the yellow dress she wear as part of her campaign- to stop dictatorship and promote democracy. The people during the said session shown their sympathy as well to Cory by wearing yellow roses. Many of the lawmakers and Cabinet members present, including Secretary of State George P. Shultz, also wore yellow ties.

             Aquino's speech was interrupted 11 times by applause, and when she finished an address laced with personal references to her assassinated husband, Philippine Sen. Benigno S. Aquino Jr., every member present stood and applauded for three minutes. As Aquino weaved her way through the crowd of lawmakers afterwards, shaking hands, several members chanted "Cory, Cory, Cory!"

Thanks Lawmakers

     "We Filipinos thank each of you for what you did--for balancing America's strategic interest against human concerns," Aquino declared as she wholeheartedly shows her gratitude towards the constitutions who helped her and her husband in protecting and defending their dignity. She appealed to Congress to accept her approach to ending the 17-year Communist insurgency that continues to threaten the stability of her government. Under the military approach Marcos employed during his two decades in power, Aquino said, the insurgency grew from 500 armed guerrillas to more than 16,000.  Marcos "went at it with hammer and tongs," Aquino said of Marcos' counterinsurgency strategy, which alienated far more Filipinos than it overcame. "I think there is a lesson to be learned about trying to stifle a thing with the means by which it grows."  On September 18, 1986, just 7 months after she was swept to power by a popular revolt against dictator Ferdinand Marcos, president Corazon C. Aquino addressed the joint session of the United States Congress during her first visit to the country since she came home to bury slain opposition leader and husband Sen. Benigno "Ninoy" S. Aquino, Jr. in August 1983.

          Former Philippine President Corazon Aquino, in a speech to a joint session of Congress that drew three standing ovations, pledged Thursday to take up "the sword of war" to end the bloody Communist insurgency that has plagued the Philippines for 17 years if rebel leaders spurn her government's offers of peace.

           Declaring that the revolution that brought her to power was "the cheapest revolution ever," Aquino also told cheering lawmakers that her nation deserves to be freed from the "slavery" of its devastated economy. She appealed for both the U.S. government and private investors to "build a new home for democracy" in the Philippines, now staggering under a $26-billion foreign debt.

              Aquino's tough yet intensely personal address marked her first appearance before Congress since she helped overthrow former Philippine strongman Ferdinand E. Marcos last February.

             Aquino wore her signature yellow suit, and nearly every senator and congressman in the hall marked the occasion by wearing in his lapel a yellow rose--the color of Aquino's three-year protest campaign. Many of the lawmakers and Cabinet members present, including Secretary of State George P. Shultz, also wore yellow ties.

             Aquino's speech was interrupted 11 times by applause, and when she finished an address laced with personal references to her assassinated husband, Philippine Sen. Benigno S. Aquino Jr., every member present stood and applauded for three minutes. As Aquino weaved her way through the crowd of lawmakers afterwards, shaking hands, several members chanted "Cory, Cory, Cory!"

               Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kan.) congratulated Aquino, telling her, "You hit a home run." Aquino smiled broadly and quickly replied, "I just hope the bases were loaded."

         Hoped for Catalyst

       Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), who is sponsoring a similar but long-pending $200-million aid appropriation in the Senate, said in an interview that he hopes Aquino's speech will be a catalyst for action on the bill, which has been threatened by special-interest amendments.

      One such amendment, sponsored by Sen. John Melcher (D-Mont.), would require previously earmarked aid to the Philippines to include surplus American wheat and powdered milk, which Lugar and other experts say would hurt the economy of the Philippines, where there is already a wheat surplus.

Of the speech itself, Lugar said, "Those who attended were transfixed--it was awesome." Lugar was instrumental in bolstering Aquino's victory last February as chairman of a team of congressional observers who witnessed massive election fraud by Marcos's supporters.

Noting that his role in the Philippine election was controversial, Lugar added, "I felt entirely vindicated when I saw all these senators and congressmen falling all over each other after the speech to get photographed with her (Aquino)."

Thanks Lawmakers

Aquino used the occasion to personally thank members of Congress for defending her and her protest movement, even when the Reagan Administration continued to support Marcos after her husband's August, 1983, assassination, a murder for which Aquino has said the former president is, at least indirectly, responsible.

"We Filipinos thank each of you for what you did--for balancing America's strategic interest against human concerns," Aquino declared.

She appealed to Congress to accept her approach to ending the 17-year Communist insurgency that continues to threaten the stability of her government. Under the military approach Marcos employed during his two decades in power, Aquino said, the insurgency grew from 500 armed guerrillas to more than 16,000.

Marcos "went at it with hammer and tongs," Aquino said of Marcos' counterinsurgency strategy, which alienated far more Filipinos than it overcame. "I think there is a lesson to be learned about trying to stifle a thing with the means by which it grows." Nonetheless, she still insist that if her plans and offers does not work she would not think twice to threathen the peace she established.

Speech
of

Her Excellency Corazon C. Aquino
President of the Philippines
During the Joint Session of the United States Congress

[Delivered at Washington, D.C., on September 18, 1986]

Portrait of Her Excellency Cory Aquino 

Three years ago, I left America in grief to bury my husband, Ninoy Aquino. I thought I had left it also to lay to rest his restless dream of Philippine freedom. Today, I have returned as the president of a free people.

In burying Ninoy, a whole nation honored him. By that brave and selfless act of giving honor, a nation in shame recovered its own. A country that had lost faith in its future found it in a faithless and brazen act of murder. So in giving, we receive, in losing we find, and out of defeat, we snatched our victory.

Ninoy Aquino' s Burial

For the nation, Ninoy became the pleasing sacrifice that answered their prayers for freedom. For myself and our children, Ninoy was a loving husband and father. His loss, three times in our lives, was always a deep and painful one.

Fourteen years ago this month was the first time we lost him. A president-turned-dictator, and traitor to his oath, suspended the Constitution and shut down the Congress that was much like this one before which I am honored to speak. He detained my husband along with thousands of others – senators, publishers and anyone who had spoken up for the democracy as its end drew near. But for Ninoy, a long and cruel ordeal was reserved. The dictator already knew that Ninoy was not a body merely to be imprisoned but a spirit he must break. For even as the dictatorship demolished one by one the institutions of democracy – the press, the Congress, the independence of the judiciary, the protection of the Bill of Rights – Ninoy kept their spirit alive in himself.

Then-President Marcos as "traitor" and "snatcher of democracy"

The government sought to break him by indignities and terror. They locked him up in a tiny, nearly airless cell in a military camp in the north. They stripped him naked and held the threat of sudden midnight execution over his head. Ninoy held up manfully–all of it. I barely did as well. For 43 days, the authorities would not tell me what had happened to him. This was the first time my children and I felt we had lost him.

When that didn’t work, they put him on trial for subversion, murder and a host of other crimes before a military commission. Ninoy challenged its authority and went on a fast. If he survived it, then, he felt, God intended him for another fate. We had lost him again. For nothing would hold him back from his determination to see his fast through to the end. He stopped only when it dawned on him that the government would keep his body alive after the fast had destroyed his brain. And so, with barely any life in his body, he called off the fast on the fortieth day. God meant him for other things, he felt. He did not know that an early death would still be his fate, that only the timing was wrong.

At any time during his long ordeal, Ninoy could have made a separate peace with the dictatorship, as so many of his countrymen had done. But the spirit of democracy that inheres in our race and animates this chamber could not be allowed to die. He held out, in the loneliness of his cell and the frustration of exile, the democratic alternative to the insatiable greed and mindless cruelty of the right and the purging holocaust of the left.

A CCTV footage of assassination of Ninoy Aquino on
21st of August 1983

And then, we lost him, irrevocably and more painfully than in the past. The news came to us in Boston. It had to be after the three happiest years of our lives together. But his death was my country’s resurrection in the courage and faith by which alone they could be free again. The dictator had called him a nobody. Two million people threw aside their passivity and escorted him to his grave. And so began the revolution that has brought me to democracy’s most famous home, the Congress of the United States.

The task had fallen on my shoulders to continue offering the democratic alternative to our people.

Archibald Macleish had said that democracy must be defended by arms when it is attacked by arms and by truth when it is attacked by lies. He failed to say how it shall be won.

I held fast to Ninoy’s conviction that it must be by the ways of democracy. I held out for participation in the 1984 election the dictatorship called, even if I knew it would be rigged. I was warned by the lawyers of the opposition that I ran the grave risk of legitimizing the foregone results of elections that were clearly going to be fraudulent. But I was not fighting for lawyers but for the people in whose intelligence I had implicit faith. By the exercise of democracy, even in a dictatorship, they would be prepared for democracy when it came. And then, also, it was the only way I knew by which we could measure our power even in the terms dictated by the dictatorship.

The people vindicated me in an election shamefully marked by government thuggery and fraud. The opposition swept the elections, garnering a clear majority of the votes, even if they ended up, thanks to a corrupt Commission on Elections, with barely a third of the seats in parliament. Now, I knew our power.

Last year, in an excess of arrogance, the dictatorship called for its doom in a snap election. The people obliged. With over a million signatures, they drafted me to challenge the dictatorship. And I obliged them. The rest is the history that dramatically unfolded on your television screen and across the front pages of your newspapers.

You saw a nation, armed with courage and integrity, stand fast by democracy against threats and corruption. You saw women poll watchers break out in tears as armed goons crashed the polling places to steal the ballots but, just the same, they tied themselves to the ballot boxes. You saw a people so committed to the ways of democracy that they were prepared to give their lives for its pale imitation. At the end of the day, before another wave of fraud could distort the results, I announced the people’s victory.

The distinguished co-chairman of the United States observer team in his report to your President described that victory:

“I was witness to an extraordinary manifestation of democracy on the part of the Filipino people. The ultimate result was the election of Mrs. Corazon C. Aquino as President and Mr. Salvador Laurel as Vice-President of the Philippines.”

Pres. Cory (left) and V. Pres. Laurel (right)

Many of you here today played a part in changing the policy of your country towards us. We, Filipinos, thank each of you for what you did: for, balancing America’s strategic interest against human concerns, illuminates the American vision of the world.

When a subservient parliament announced my opponent’s victory, the people turned out in the streets and proclaimed me President. And true to their word, when a handful of military leaders declared themselves against the dictatorship, the people rallied to their protection. Surely, the people take care of their own. It is on that faith and the obligation it entails, that I assumed the presidency.

As I came to power peacefully, so shall I keep it. That is my contract with my people and my commitment to God. He had willed that the blood drawn with the lash shall not, in my country, be paid by blood drawn by the sword but by the tearful joy of reconciliation.

We have swept away absolute power by a limited revolution that respected the life and freedom of every Filipino. Now, we are restoring full constitutional government. Again, as we restored democracy by the ways of democracy, so are we completing the constitutional structures of our new democracy under a constitution that already gives full respect to the Bill of Rights. A jealously independent Constitutional Commission is completing its draft which will be submitted later this year to a popular referendum. When it is approved, there will be congressional elections. So within about a year from a peaceful but national upheaval that overturned a dictatorship, we shall have returned to full constitutional government. Given the polarization and breakdown we inherited, this is no small achievement.

My predecessor set aside democracy to save it from a communist insurgency that numbered less than 500. Unhampered by respect for human rights, he went at it hammer and tongs. By the time he fled, that insurgency had grown to more than 16,000. I think there is a lesson here to be learned about trying to stifle a thing with the means by which it grows.

I don’t think anybody, in or outside our country, concerned for a democratic and open Philippines, doubts what must be done. Through political initiatives and local reintegration programs, we must seek to bring the insurgents down from the hills and, by economic progress and justice, show them that for which the best intentioned among them fight.

As President, I will not betray the cause of peace by which I came to power. Yet equally, and again no friend of Filipino democracy will challenge this, I will not stand by and allow an insurgent leadership to spurn our offer of peace and kill our young soldiers, and threaten our new freedom.

Yet, I must explore the path of peace to the utmost for at its end, whatever disappointment I meet there, is the moral basis for laying down the olive branch of peace and taking up the sword of war. Still, should it come to that, I will not waver from the course laid down by your great liberator: “With malice towards none, with charity for all, with firmness in the rights as God gives us to see the rights, let us finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow and for his orphans, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”

Like Lincoln, I understand that force may be necessary before mercy. Like Lincoln, I don’t relish it. Yet, I will do whatever it takes to defend the integrity and freedom of my country.

Finally, may I turn to that other slavery: our $26 billion foreign debt. I have said that we shall honor it. Yet must the means by which we shall be able to do so be kept from us? Many conditions imposed on the previous government that stole this debt continue to be imposed on us who never benefited from it. And no assistance or liberality commensurate with the calamity that was visited on us has been extended. Yet ours must have been the cheapest revolution ever. With little help from others, we Filipinos fulfilled the first and most difficult conditions of the debt negotiation the full restoration of democracy and responsible government. Elsewhere, and in other times of more stringent world economic conditions, Marshall plans and their like were felt to be necessary companions of returning democracy.

When I met with President Reagan yesterday, we began an important dialogue about cooperation and the strengthening of the friendship between our two countries. That meeting was both a confirmation and a new beginning and should lead to positive results in all areas of common concern.

Today, we face the aspirations of a people who had known so much poverty and massive unemployment for the past 14 years and yet offered their lives for the abstraction of democracy. Wherever I went in the campaign, slum area or impoverished village, they came to me with one cry: democracy! Not food, although they clearly needed it, but democracy. Not work, although they surely wanted it, but democracy. Not money, for they gave what little they had to my campaign. They didn’t expect me to work a miracle that would instantly put food into their mouths, clothes on their back, education in their children, and work that will put dignity in their lives. But I feel the pressing obligation to respond quickly as the leader of a people so deserving of all these things.

We face a communist insurgency that feeds on economic deterioration, even as we carry a great share of the free world defenses in the Pacific. These are only two of the many burdens my people carry even as they try to build a worthy and enduring house for their new democracy, that may serve as well as a redoubt for freedom in Asia. Yet, no sooner is one stone laid than two are taken away. Half our export earnings, $2 billion out of $4 billion, which was all we could earn in the restrictive markets of the world, went to pay just the interest on a debt whose benefit the Filipino people never received.

Still, we fought for honor, and, if only for honor, we shall pay. And yet, should we have to wring the payments from the sweat of our men’s faces and sink all the wealth piled up by the bondsman’s two hundred fifty years of unrequited toil?

Yet to all Americans, as the leader of a proud and free people, I address this question: has there been a greater test of national commitment to the ideals you hold dear than that my people have gone through? You have spent many lives and much treasure to bring freedom to many lands that were reluctant to receive it. And here you have a people who won it by themselves and need only the help to preserve it.

Three years ago, I said thank you, America, for the haven from oppression, and the home you gave Ninoy, myself and our children, and for the three happiest years of our lives together. Today, I say, join us, America, as we build a new home for democracy, another haven for the oppressed, so it may stand as a shining testament of our two nation’s commitment to freedom.

Retrieved from: http://articles.latimes.com/1986-09-19/news/mn-10872_1_president-                                  aquino
                    http://www.gov.ph/1986/09/18/speech-of-president-corazon-aquino-during                  -the-joint-session-of-the-u-s-congress-september-18-1986/                                                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZnnvbKyNCQ